Comments

Letter to Christi on December 27, 2010 — 13 Comments

  1. Sheila – your story and your reflections about your son are so moving, and the letter format serves it well – it seems to make it more intimate, as if you were writing to me or talking to me over a cup of tea. Just yesterday I started to write about a friend who is dealing with severe depression and the stress for me of providing support for her. Another friend had encouraged me to write about it, and now, after reading your piece, it occurs to me that this form might provide the tone I’m looking for – I could write it as a letter or series of letters to the friend in whom I confided. Thanks for opening yourself up in this way for us – both your experience as a mother and as a writer are inspirational.

  2. Sheila, Thank you for the gift of the process, the process of carrying this profound grief in your heart for ten years. I love how your letter is “contained” by the birth and the death of two dear people in your life and how this sense of continuity is communicated to me with a sense that in our humanity we don’t really need a face or a fingerprint. It is the essence of those who have gone before us and our willingness to still “get up every day and feed the children” as Mary Oliver tells us.

    Thank you Seth. Thank you for your willingness to carve such a huge well of giving in your mother and for inspiring her to share from that well with so many. Thank you both for allowing me to swim there with you now.

    Sleep well Sheila. Indeed your work is “right work” and I am honored to be sustained in it, in the “harsh beauty” of it.

  3. I think that letters can free us and slow us down, not unlike movements in Tai Chi when body, mind and soul can move together. They allow a kind of intimacy and reflection that might hover at the edges of an essay; whereas a letter form invites the writer to be more present. Emails are more cryptic, meaning can get cut off and mindfulness seems more at risk in any intimate, full way. But even those one-liners could explode into an essay. Your letter shows how the form connects you to your friend and allows you to explore ‘not doing’ in relationship to your grief and need to engage doing in a way that celebrates and holds your son, near and dear. And, yet, you release this letter to the world and we read with love in our hearts. Yes, I echo Karin, thank you.

  4. Such a gift. Using words as healing. A dialogue between two writers, an even greater gift. Imagine, looking words up in the dictionary in order to explore them further and to take what the dictionary offers, beyond what is defined on paper, to own them for what is shared betweeen two writers, to enhance the connection. There is a miracle at work, knowing that the recipient will respond. What a gift that this correspondence is being shared with us.It is such a blessing. I do experience such inspiration after reading Sheilas letter to her friend. The words offered are sacred and bring tears to my eyes.

  5. That “invitation to dialog” is the important thing. I still write letters long hand and feel such joy when the recipient responds, which confirms “connection”. Epistolary essays, even when not weighty, are an exercise in the back and forth weaving of relationships, in which there is found enrichment. This kind of slow unfolding gives us more time and provides more depth than the flash of emailing. Hearing back is everything to the writer hoping for dialogue.

  6. Dear Writers,
    Thank you all who have already posted comments on this letter and those of you who will as the week goes on. It means a lot to me–hearing back is part of the beauty of the epistolary form. You confirm that for me. As a writer, I imagined my recipient as my audience, and hoped as I wrote that what I could say best by imagining her reading the letter would resonate with many others.

    Writing is an invitation to dialog and to connection and I am so buoyed by your responses.

    Sheila

  7. I started reading with trepidation–perhaps because I have a firstborn son I worry about. Even now, I’m worried because he’s on the long drive back to his home in Virginia from having spent time with us in Boston over Christmas. Nervous mother that I am, I always worry about the worst things happening. Sheila’s piece made me ache with the loss of Seth, as have previous writings she’s done on the subject. I’m sure this comes from the details. I can see the accident, the fiancee’s family gathered in the lodge, the later devastating decision to remove life support, knowing there was brain function despite Seth’s beauty–ouch! Yet, weaving through this I feel the amazing power of connection and love, both in the letter writing to a beloved friend and also in the communication with the daughter. I feel an ongoing presence of Seth both in what the daughter has to say and in the section on Admiralty Bay. These things buoy me, as I’m sure they do for Sheila. The episolary form is particularly effective to give a sense of an empathic listener that helps both the writer and the reader cope with the ache of loss.

  8. “Lace.” What a wonderful metaphor for life, the intricate weaving, and the spaces left open, so delicate and beautiful. Your words left my cheeks wet and in my throat it’s hard to swallow. I just saw a movie last night where queen Liliuokalani says to princess Ka’iulani “You have to make room for the living.” I think it is by far the hardest thing a mother can do in this world. It sounds like you have already learned this. I feel grateful you can share such a painful experience honestly and openly. You are always talking about letting the reader in and this letter is the perfect way to let us do just that. I am moved and shaken a bit, feeling sad about such a great loss but, I can’t help but feel an inner warmth too. A warmth that comes from knowing that you are making room for the living and not letting the under current pull over you. I feel humbled — very powerful Sheila.

  9. Oh, ditto and ditto.

    Essays in letter form are my natural bent. Letter writing consumed hours of my time long before I could keyboard the computer. I didn’t know for a long time that my letters were more than letters. A letter, especially hand written, is more than personal. The recipient can hold you in her hand. Christi can feel you touch her just by holding the page on which you pour your heart. The treasure of essay as letter is that it can be put in a pocket or tucked into a book, experienced again in a warm bed just before sleep, opened again, read and re-read. All of its nuances, things spoken and not spoken swim to the surface and dive again, like ripples in a stream, surrendering the many hidden nuggets within the words. We who only know of your Seth through you can feel him, hear him, recognize his heartful pleasure in the not “not doing”, we can “see” him through your love and we can mine your words to find your loss and your triumph and understand it through you.

    A letter is always revelation about what you wish to say. What isn’t wished for never makes the cut. It’s why people love to get letters, and telling the “say” things in essay form includes the reader. Essaying in a letter, that epistolary thing…love that word….orders the mind into flow not worked for, not contrived, just running like clear water over the river rock of your heart and the secret stones of your mind. The greatest compliment, I think, is when a recipient says “You write just like you talk. Like you’re right here with me”. I feel that in your essay letter. If I were sitting in your kitchen listening to you tell me this treasured piece of your life, I’d hear it exactly this way.

    Seth is somewhere we can’t yet go. Life is a continuum. I don’t know how I know. I know. In the meantime, the fruit of your body in the forms it has taken, daughter, grandboys, is the nourishment for your mother/grandmother existence around which swirls all the rest that you are: nurturer, teacher, willing friend, writer, author, poet, treasured gift to each and every one of us who know undiluted love when we receive it in the many forms with which you freely dispense it. There are only paltry words to describe the impact you make on our lives, Sheila. “Deeply grateful” hardly suffices.

  10. I think that letters can free us and slow us down, not unlike movements in Tai Chi when body, mind and soul can move together. They allow a kind of intimacy and reflection that might hover at the edges of an essay; whereas a letter form invites the writer to be more present. Emails are more cryptic, meaning can get cut off and mindfulness seems more at risk in any intimate, full way. But even those one-liners could explode into an essay. Your letter shows how the form connects you to your friend and allows you to explore ‘not doing’ in relationship to your grief and need to engage doing in a way that celebrates and holds your son, near and dear. And, yet, you release this letter to the world and we read with love in our hearts. Yes, I echo Karin, thank you.

  11. Dear Sheila,

    I am moved by your letter to Christi, which reveals so well your love for Seth, your grandchildren and your daughter, and of course, Christi. This is such a beautiful piece that as I was reading it I forgot that it was a letter. It flows so well and is so open with so much feeling that I was drawn into it right from the start. You have given us such detailed descriptions of the town and your place where you go each year on the anniversary that it is easy to be there with you. I think it is a beautiful format to use, which reveals so much about you. Thank you for sharing this touching letter with us, Sheila. My heart goes out to you.
    Marjorie Webb

  12. Hi Sheila,
    It’s difficult for me to comment on “the form” because your letter is still lodged in my heart. I wish to keep it there for awhile before I reread and use any fraction of my intellect in analyzing.
    The love that you have for Seth, for your daughter, grandchildren,for your friend, and for the universe, shine through. As a reader, writer, and devoted student I can only say “Thanks”

    Karin

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>