Comments

Moving an Essay Toward Completion — Pam Robinson’s “Table of Plenty” — 6 Comments

  1. I liked the revision better than the first version. I loved to see the mother and daughter making holiday meals together with the daughter now making the major contribution, except for the bourbon balls and the rolls that the mother still makes better. Very evocative piece!

  2. I feel the reminiscent days of an older time, a different work ethic. I sense the contribution of mama to the enterprise, but the clear priority of a young daughter who gets to eat first. The shift to fast food in retirement seems a leap forward in time and feels a bit ironic. But the warmth of cooking dinner together feels redeeming. I wonder if they have cooked together in the meantime. The joy of conversation, tasting each others dishes in process and the return to making biscuits, mama’s signature baked item satisfies as a true thanksgiving.

  3. In the first write, Pam seems to describe a woman content to do the provision of meals for field hands beyond just exercising her responsibility. I admire her perhaps dogged devotion to the special duty that often fell to women. Cooking then had nothing to do with gourmet. I’m looking here at a skilled cook, not chef, with a repertoire of foods she enjoyed making, but wondered, if there were no field hands to serve, what would she reduce that to? Was Estelle deliberately sacrificing, or meeting a need given her skills. Everyone works on a farm, no slackers. With the recitation of her preparations I was reminded I haven’t eaten lunch and wish I’d been at her table.

    I loved the revision, where Pam wraps it up neatly, doesn’t leave me much to think to change, add, subtract, and tells me what I suspected: Estelle, when finally released from duty is at once glad to get off her feet, and still wants to prepare food, though at a slower pace, with her daughter, for her company, not for the chance to cook again. When the author moves from food prep to a presentation of the woman underneath, we see Estelle with clarity, and I leave the piece saying to myself, “Oh, now I see her true character.This is a hard worker, a team player, executing her job” This is a woman of duty,not of playing at provision. She enjoys producing great food, because she’s skilled, but she’s meeting the need. There’s an Estelle in my life, too. Just because she performs doesn’t mean she doesn’t like doing it. The doing of it indicates recreation for Estelle but it’s not why she’s there in the kitchen. She’s working as an extension of all the other things she does to get the tobacco to market. I’m wondering though, how would sentimentality, that thing Pam doesn’t do, looks. I worry ALL the time that my own work is nostalgic, perhaps sentimental in its content and work up hill to deflect such a tendency, a challenge, when early life contained some good parts!

    • You raise an important writing point about how nostalgia works in our writing–when writing the past or the present or even the future, the details bring readers close to the scenes and the readers’ feelings arise as they did in you when you read Pam’s work. When the details don’t do the work and the writer interjects too much and tells her feelings or how we should feel, the readers become distanced and get the idea that the writer misses the old days, but they are not encouraged to feel their feelings as readers.

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>